>> oneway=yes can be interpreted as referring to pedestrians on footways (it >> looks like osm-carto already does this?
The Openstreetmap-carto style shows one-way arrows on highway=footway and highway=path because these features can also be used by bicycles in many places. - Joseph Eisenberg On 1/12/20, Jarek Piórkowski <ja...@piorkowski.ca> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 11:57, Martin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 17:17 Uhr schrieb Jarek Piórkowski >> <ja...@piorkowski.ca>: >>> I imagine that virtually all real-world pedestrian ways that are >>> one-way for pedestrians would be on dedicated pedestrian ways - that >>> is, highway=footway. If that's correct, oneway=yes can be interpreted >>> as referring to pedestrians on footways (it looks like osm-carto >>> already does this?). I struggle to imagine a one-way pedestrian way >>> that is also open to bicycle riders (dismount still works in this >>> scheme). >> >> there are many highway=footway with bicycle=yes tags in Germany and other >> countries, where this is used to model a "cyclists can use it" (with major >> precaution) on footways: >> http://www.gruene-badvilbel.de/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Verkehrszeichen-Fu%C3%9Fweg_Fahrrad-frei.jpg > > Are there many that are one-way for cyclists or for pedestrians but not > both? > > --Jarek > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging