>> oneway=yes can be interpreted  as referring to pedestrians on footways (it 
>> looks like osm-carto already does this?

The Openstreetmap-carto style shows one-way arrows on highway=footway
and highway=path because these features can also be used by bicycles
in many places.

- Joseph Eisenberg

On 1/12/20, Jarek Piórkowski <ja...@piorkowski.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 11:57, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 17:17 Uhr schrieb Jarek Piórkowski
>> <ja...@piorkowski.ca>:
>>> I imagine that virtually all real-world pedestrian ways that are
>>> one-way for pedestrians would be on dedicated pedestrian ways - that
>>> is, highway=footway. If that's correct, oneway=yes can be interpreted
>>> as referring to pedestrians on footways (it looks like osm-carto
>>> already does this?). I struggle to imagine a one-way pedestrian way
>>> that is also open to bicycle riders (dismount still works in this
>>> scheme).
>>
>> there are many highway=footway with bicycle=yes tags in Germany and other
>> countries, where this is used to model a "cyclists can use it" (with major
>> precaution) on footways:
>> http://www.gruene-badvilbel.de/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Verkehrszeichen-Fu%C3%9Fweg_Fahrrad-frei.jpg
>
> Are there many that are one-way for cyclists or for pedestrians but not
> both?
>
> --Jarek
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to