Il sab 21 dic 2019, 12:33 Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> This is missing the point.
> I only want to point out that apparently roundtrip=yes without any
> additional tagging is being used as meaning "this route is a loop" and
> "round-trip=no" as meaning it's an A-to-b route. This should remain valid.
>

It is.
Well, with latest wiki version:
Roundtrip=yes is A to B (to C?) to A.
Roundtrip=no is A to B (to C?)

And let us consider how to cater for other cases.
>

Sure .. but if you're open to the change..

Any retagging would mean a lot of manual work. I cannot see any simple way
> (leaving out AI) to determine whether any given route is a loop or
> something else.
>


I feel this is the right approach...
We can define how to fix existing routes as soon as we find an eligible
approach


>
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2019, 11:27 Francesco Ansanelli, <franci...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> And with existing tags how you describe it?
>>
>> Il sab 21 dic 2019, 10:28 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>>> On 21/12/19 19:49, Francesco Ansanelli wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Volker,
>>>
>>> I saw that someone went ahead and changed the wiki again:
>>>
>>> Use roundtrip=yes to indicate that start and end of a route are at the
>>> same location.
>>>
>>> I think this new definition matches your idea of roundtrip and it's fine
>>> for both definitions.
>>> My last offer is to abandon the closed_loop tag in favour of:
>>>
>>> roundtrip:type=linear|circular
>>>
>>> Do you agree?
>>>
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> "Type" means nothing. Perhaps roundtrip:route=*???
>>>
>>> As for the values .. you will need to define them!
>>>
>>> 'My' local bus route starts off with ways that are used both directions
>>> .. and then separates into a loop where the segments are only used in one
>>> direction.
>>>
>>> I could imaging routes that have several loops  used in one direction
>>> and then ways that are used in both directions .. arrr there is another
>>> route that does that ...
>>>
>>> So what values will there be to cover complex cases???
>>>
>>>
>>> Francesco
>>>
>>>
>>> Il ven 20 dic 2019, 22:45 Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> Please revert the roundtrip wiki change, but let's put any other
>>>> wiki-changes on halt for a moment.
>>>> What we need to do is to find out how the roundtrip tag is being used
>>>> (the wiki is suposed to document the actual use, not what the use should
>>>> be) and in particular if there is a more-than sporadic use of
>>>> roundtrip=yes|no for anything else than loop=yes|no.
>>>> It's difficult to get reliable quantitative results, but:
>>>> A fast overpass turbo wizard query
>>>> "type:relation and route=bicycle and roundtrip=yes in
>>>> Italy|France|England|USA|Bayern"
>>>> resulted in
>>>> Italy: 58 lines with at best a handful of them not closed loops
>>>> France: 358 lines with maybe 10 non-loops
>>>> England:  25 lines, all loops.
>>>> USA:  29, about 6 non-loops
>>>> Bavaria 213, did not find any non-loops
>>>> For me this is a strong indication that the large majority of all cycle
>>>> route relations in these countries that have a roundrip=yes are in fact
>>>> loops and that that this is the de-facto use of the tag.
>>>> I think this is a strong case against any change.
>>>>
>>>> Taginfo points in the same direction
>>>> 12665 roundtrip=no
>>>> 21774 roundtrip=yes
>>>> 42 closed_loop=yes
>>>> no closed_loop=no
>>>>
>>>> Volker
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 18:17, Francesco Ansanelli <franci...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In my opinion the options are:
>>>>>
>>>>> - deprecate roundtrip in favour of 2 tags with a generally agreed
>>>>> naming convention (best at this point)
>>>>> - keep roundtrip and closed_loop with the wiki definition I did change
>>>>> (relations must be updated accordingly)
>>>>>
>>>>> I read many of you asked a revert, I just want to point out that is
>>>>> not a resolution because tag is currently messed up
>>>>>
>>>>> Il ven 20 dic 2019, 15:08 Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> ha
>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19/12/2019 22:48, Phake Nick wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Merriam Webster and some other resources you have quoted are
>>>>>> dictionary for American English, not the variant of English used by OSM.
>>>>>> Posts by original author of the topic on the wiki talk page have 
>>>>>> explained
>>>>>> the meaning of the term in British English.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The OED definitions read as follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Originally U.S.
>>>>>>  A. n.
>>>>>>  1.
>>>>>>  a. A journey to a place and back again, along the same route; (also)
>>>>>> a journey to one or more places and back again which does not cover the
>>>>>> same ground twice, a circular tour or trip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  b. Baseball. A home run. Cf. round-tripper n. 2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  2. In extended use and figurative, esp. (Mining and Oil Industry) an
>>>>>> act of withdrawing and replacing a drill pipe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  3. Stock Market (originally U.S.). The action or an instance of
>>>>>> buying and selling the same stock, commodity, etc., often simultaneously.
>>>>>> Cf. round turn n. 4.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  B. adj. (attributive). Chiefly North American.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  1. Of or relating to a round trip (in various senses). Cf. return n.
>>>>>> Compounds 1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  2. That makes or has made a round trip (literal and figurative).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  C. adv. Chiefly North American.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   As a round trip; by travelling to a place and back again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note the frequent references to 'U.S.' and 'North American'. It's an
>>>>>> American phrase, though now widely adopted in the UK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to