On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:41 PM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
> 20 Dec 2019, 23:04 by graemefi...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 19:18, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 20. Dec 2019, at 04:02, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > that [/the/] (one & only) road servicing an area is dirt, if you're
> lucky, 2 lanes wide, but is used constantly by heavy traffic (semi-trailers
> with 3 o4 4 trailers on the back).
> >
> > How do we tie that into the nice neat Motorway > Primary > Secondary etc
> arrangement?
>
>
> lanes=2
> surface=unpaved
>
>
> Thanks, Martin :-)
>
> But would they still count as either =trunk or =primary?
>
> While they're of high local importance, they're definitely not
> high-performance & they don't link major population centres either?
>
> Main road linking villages (even unpaved
> and unmaintained) is
> highway=unclassified (yes, confusing name
> is confusing).
>

The British idea of "unclassified" maps nicely in Alaska to borough roads
(I would generally assume to be paved or at least graded if not graded and
graveled), since the usable space on U roads in the UK is substantially
smaller than tertiary and lanes are typically not present, or even singular
despite two way travel.


> Maybe this fits here?
>

Eeeh, maybe, but a long stretch.  In the US, it's generally established
that state highways are highway=secondary, even if unpaved, in the lower 48
and Hawaii.  Though the "unpaved" part has been obsolete since AR 220 went
from surface=dirt (it wasn't even graveled) to surface=asphalt, 4 years ago
in two weeks in the lower 48 and Hawaii.  Alaska is currently the only
state, territory or posession of the US that has unpaved state highways and
the last of the same that will ever have unpaved highways in the Eisenhower
Interstate Defense Highway System (despite having no signed network US:I
routes presently).  With that context, AK 2 fits pretty obviously as
highway=secondary.  Based on my look just now, looks like that's a good fit
saved for portions within Fairbanks metro, which would be a good
highway=trunk segment.  There are no portions that I see as rising to
highway=motorway, despite being presently mapped as such in some parts of
Fairbanks.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to