Can't disagree with the idea behind it, Paul. As we've mentioned any number of times, there are areas here in Australia (as there would be in the US, Canada & any number of other places), that [/the/] (one & only) road servicing an area is dirt, if you're lucky, 2 lanes wide, but is used constantly by heavy traffic (semi-trailers with 3 o4 4 trailers on the back).
How do we tie that into the nice neat Motorway > Primary > Secondary etc arrangement? Thanks Graeme On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 10:27, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 1:19 PM Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > >> I actually like your suggestion that highway=trunk does not add much >> value to the U.S. map, Eric. >> We love to add detail / granularity to OSM so much, it can become hard to >> envisage taking some away. >> Not saying we should abolish trunk right here and now, but something I'd >> consider as one outcome. >> > > I'd like to see a lot more left up to the data consumer and more regional > values to be widely acceptable. For example, instead of trying to smash > the entire planet into the UK's prescribed values and trying to come up > with equivalences, use the terminology each country uses. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
