On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 23:06, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Not unclear at all. > > The only thing that both the foot-cycle crossing and the foot-cycle sidepath > are tagged as single ways (highway=path, bicycle=designated, foot=designated, > segregated=yes). > And there are hundreds of these around the city. > So "my" tagging ignores the relative positions of foot and cycle lanes, and > there is only one kerb on each side of the crossing. The crossing way extends > to the centre line of the sidepath way, the kerb is on the crossing way.
In both examples, the cycleway is physically separated from the footway by a row of trees except at the crossing. Therefore mapping them as separate ways makes sense. Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging