Sorry for being late to the party! My understanding is that there isn't a documented tagging strategy for a marked cycle lane crossing that's mapped as on a street way.
cycleway=crossing covers this scenario if the cycleway has been separately mapped, so I wonder if a proposal for a tag like cycleway: right:lane=crossing would be a logical extension. It could be applied to the street way from the start of the crossing to the end of the crossing. Specifying the crossing type (if necessary) could lead to an awkwardly long key, as the nested would always need a side-of-street reference, like cycleway:right:lane:crossing=uncontrolled. Maybe there should just be one tag: cycleway:right: crossing=yes/no/uncontrolled (whatever that means)/unmarked. Best, Nick On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, 7:13 AM Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do have a topological problem with the mapping of a junction of two > roads one of which has parallel cycle lanesa and sidewalks > Both are correctly mapped: the sidewalk as a separate highwy=footway and > the cycle lanes as cycleway:left|right=lane. > How to you tag the foot-cycle crossings. > See this Mapillary photo > <https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/yXHAsaqTftjViiDnGddjXg> to make things > clearer. > Two possible options: > > (1) > way with: > crossing=uncontrolled > footway=crossing > highway=footway > plus node with: > crossing=uncontrolled > highway=crossing > > (2) > way with: > bicycle=designated > foot=designated > highway=path > path=crossing > segregated=yes > plus node with: > bicycle=yes > crossing=uncontrolled > highway=crossing > > Both are "incorrect" in some aspects. > Which one is less incorrect? > Is there a better tagging solution? > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
