Am Di., 12. Nov. 2019 um 11:49 Uhr schrieb Dave F via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
> We are (almost) all volunteers, Joseph. It's irritating that this claim > is repeatedly rolled out as an excuse. > > I'm increasingly disappointed my *voluntary* contributions to the OSM > database are are not being fairly or accurately being represented by > OSM-Carto due to errors in the programming. It's ridiculous these errors > (many of the 400 open issues) can't be fixed "for many years". > > Is OSM-Carto fit to be promoted as OSM's flagship, de-facto rendering? > Dave, I find it extremely unfair to write this explicitly to Joseph, because he is one of the very active contributors to OSM-carto at the moment and has tackled a lot of issues. > Please get back to me when OSM-Carto has a valid reason for not > rendering disused bridges. how are you tagging them? What do you mean by "disused" bridges? Could they still be used, or would it be dangerous? Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
