We also map the phone number of phoneboxes using phone=. We do not generally contact phoneboxes.
Phil (trigpoint) On Tuesday, 8 October 2019, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 8. Oct 2019, at 15:40, Colin Smale via Tagging > > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > In that case it makes perfect sense to consolidate onto one or the other. > > But if there are any perceived semantic differences, however subtle, then > > either we find some way to represent that using other tagging, or we accept > > that a certain nuance will be lost. > > > > there could be phone numbers with automatic announcements, so “phone” will > still be valid, but contact:phone would not suit well. To give an example. It > cannot be seen from the “phone”-key that this is the case though. I’m happy > with loosing the subtle differences that may make “contact:”-prefixed tags > slightly more specific, in exchange for more universally usable > “almost-equal” more generic tags without the prefix. > > Cheers Martin -- Sent from my Sailfish device _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
