On 2019-10-08 21:51, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> On 8. Oct 2019, at 15:40, Colin Smale via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org>
> wrote:
>
>> In that case it makes perfect sense to consolidate onto one or the other.
>> But if there are any perceived semantic differences, however subtle, then
>> either we find some way to represent that using other tagging, or we accept
>> that a certain nuance will be lost.
>
> there could be phone numbers with automatic announcements, so "phone" will
> still be valid, but contact:phone would not suit well. To give an example. It
> cannot be seen from the "phone"-key that this is the case though. I'm happy
> with loosing the subtle differences that may make "contact:"-prefixed tags
> slightly more specific, in exchange for more universally usable
> "almost-equal" more generic tags without the prefix.
So the subtlety you are referring to, is that some phone numbers
routinely connect to a recording instead of a human.
How about phone:recorded_message=* which would leave room for phone=*
for a manned line, or recorded_message=yes, which would not?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
