2 Sep 2019, 03:21 by graemefi...@gmail.com:
>
>
> On Sun, 1 Sep 2019 at 21:57, Paul Allen <> pla16...@gmail.com
> <mailto:pla16...@gmail.com>> > wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm fairly happy with flood_probability. There's something nagging at the
>> back of my
>> mind saying I ought to be unhappy with flood_probability, but it's not
>> telling me why.
>>
>
> How about something like:
> flood_potential=100y / 1% + depth=1.2
>
This kind of data is not
verifiable and not surveyable by an
OSM mapper.
It is impossible to improve, verify
or maintain this.
There is no point in dumping it into OSM,
it should stay as a separate dataset.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
