Martin wrote:> IMHO no. We do not need tags of an is_in fashion for this, > we
can model this universally by making use of implicit > spatial relationships
(i.e. put the bike kitchen inside the community > centre or pub, or the other
way round, according to our > interpretation of the situation)
Could you/someone explain how you can search for objects that form such spatial
relationships?
I noted in another message in the thread that I am not aware of how to search
for combined features, each tagged in a separate object (point/way/relation)
close to oneanother.
Although that is in principle a separete issue from how to tag "ground truth",
I think it is relevant. And I am curious as to how such searches can be
carried out.
-- Regards / Kveðja / Hilsen Morten Lange
On Sunday, 18 August 2019, 23:22:05 CEST, Martin Koppenhoefer
<[email protected]> wrote:
sent from a phone
On 18. Aug 2019, at 23:06, Morten Lange via Tagging <[email protected]>
wrote:
I am skeptical as that makes finding them less straightforward, if you are
looking for [ a place where I can get my bicycle repaired or receive some
help].
it will require you look for them explicitly or the app you are using would
take them into account. On the other hand from my experience these aren’t
places “to get your bicycle repaired”, they are rather places you can go to and
hang out with other bicycle enthusiasts of a certain political orientation and
repair your bike yourself.
Many potential users will not know about bicycle kitchens or that other
community centres offer bicycle repairs.
again, these places around here don’t “offer bicycle repairs”, they offer
enabling you to do the repairs yourself
"
But I think they should be searchable also as somethings separate form the
ordinary bicycle shop. Additional tags can do the trick.
For bicycle kitchens I guess
service:bicycle:diy:yes might cover it.
while it isn’t factually wrong, it isn’t useful as a distinction from forprofit
places where you pay to use a space to adjust your bike
Here follow some new ideas that just popped out:
Perhaps add something like shop:bicycle:type=bicycle_kitchen
yes, if it _is_ a kind of bicycle shop. An idea that is not universally shared.
Other values for that tag could be with_pub with_cafe job_training
in_community_centre
IMHO no. We do not need tags of an is_in fashion for this, we can model this
universally by making use of implicit spatial relationships (i.e. put the bike
kitchen inside the community centre or pub, or the other way round, according
to our interpretation of the situation)
Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
