On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 10:30:49AM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 09:35:41AM +0300, Tomas Straupis wrote: > > Hello > > > > Road hierarchy is needed for a number of things: > > * deciding which classes of roads to display on different scales in a map > > * performing road network validation > > * other tasks (f.e. typification of buildings - orientation) > > > > Hierarchy would be different in different context: motorcar, bicycle, > > pedestrian etc. For the time being I'm only asking about motorcars. > > > > There is non written (or I could not find in wiki) or "de facto" > > hierarchy: > > * motorway > > * trunk > > * primary > > * secondary > > * tertiary > > * unclassified > > * residential > > * living_street > > In some regions unclassified has a higher position in hierarchy, in other > > regions unclassified, residential and living_street have the same position. > > This is fine for the time being. > > I'm also intentionally skipping _link classes. > +1
> For me unclassified is the same as residential. The difference is that > unclassified is for interconnecting residential areas, and residential > has residential traffic. So for me there cant be an unclassified within > city boundaries, and as soon as there is predominent residential it > cant be a unclassified. How have you come to that conclusion? It flatly contradicts the normal meaning. Perhaps your local area uses the term "unclassified" in a way different from the OSM convention? ael _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
