On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
we do have an established numbered scheme for admin_levels, it could be > reused to tag the administrative level that instituted the protected area, > for a state park it would have the value 4, the key could remain > “admin_level” also in the context of boundary=protected_area > I'm not entirely happy with admin_level. It's numbers, so you have to read the wiki to figure out what admin_level=4 is. I view it as a historical accident that we should avoid repeating, not a template for good taq design. The kind of protection could be readable words, like nature, or birds, or > culture, or water, air etc. > A lot better than numbers. Still has problems, such as some objects will need to have a list of values because it serves multiple purposes, but better than randomly-assigned numbers. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
