On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 at 22:13, Alan Mackie <aamac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 at 12:05, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Using natural=shrub doesn't cut it if you want to map a shrubbery like >> this: >> https://goo.gl/maps/LwNZ2Sk1X8fKxt3j9 >> > > I'd use barrier=hedge for that one. Yes it's strictly ornamental rather > than a livestock barrier, but AFAIK we have no proper distinction for that. > It's not readily apparent from that picture, but it's not a linear feature. It is a dense shrubbery covering an area roughly twice as wide as it is long. Go to https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.08946&mlon=-4.64726#map=19/52.08946/-4.64726 and look at it in an editor such as iD. There are three trees in it, but apart from that is is shrubs. Hedges are linear features (or closed polygonal linear features), not areas, so it's not a hedge. Despite the three trees, it's not woodland, either. Also, most shrubberies are not as dense as that, they permit passage. So even if we had hedge areas, shrubberies wouldn't qualify as they are not impenetrable. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
