Le sam. 6 juil. 2019 à 16:39, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > I don't know if the tag "direction=both" is used commonly with > waterways. There's no wiki page to describe this tag, and the page > Key:direction doesn't mention direction=both, though it's used 20,000 > times. More common is to add the tag "tidal=yes" to river estuaries > which are clearly affected by the tides, though this does not > necessary require reversal of water flow direction. > It seems there was communication issues during past proposals. flow_direction was introduced by sinks proposal in 2017 : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:flow_direction%3Dboth direction=both was mentioned in waterway=pressurised proposal to solve situations when water goes down and can be pumped back in water pumped power plants https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Hydropower_water_supplies#Pumped_storage_power_plants Sounds like flow_direction is more suitable to deal with water flows Apart from this issue, tidal=yes isn't the best option (recent discussions had show that yes/no only tags should be completed with more representative values) What about flow_direction=tidal ? All the best François
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
