> Do you happen to know what the legal implication is, if any? Pedestrians have the right of way at both marked and unmarked crossings in Texas, which is pretty common in other states of the USA. Sticking strictly to legal implications, marked crossings define a space where cars can't occupy while stopped.
I do believe that in at least some parts of Texas, zebra crossings have some additional legal/right-of-way implications. In this case, when I say zebra, I mean the diagonal stripes enclosed by parallel lines that outline the crossing. I have poor internet access at the moment, or I'd provide a source. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote: > On 5/24/2019 5:27 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > (I'm not aware of anywhere in the USA where there are stripes without >> traffic signs/signals. I'm sure this exists somewhere but if I saw it I'd >> think that a sign was missing.) >> >> J >> > > There is at least one such crossing near the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston > (1001 Bissonnet Street). > > Do you happen to know what the legal implication is, if any? > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
