On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:09 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > The way I see it:
> crossing=no – crossing here is not legal/possible > crossing=unmarked – there are no road markings (or traffic signals) that > indicate this is a designated crossing, but based on other factors, it’s a > location where pedestrians common cross, e.g. because of lowered kerbs, or > because the sidewalk on one side of the road ended > crossing=uncontrolled – there are road markings indicating this is a > designated pedestrian crossing, but no traffic signals that explicitly tell > pedestrians when they have to stop > crossing=traffic_signals – there are explicit traffic signals that tell > pedestrians when to stop. There are very likely road markings, but even if > not, the absence of road markings, in the presence of actual traffic signals, > is irrelevant for how this crossing operates. Does any of this change in a jurisdiction where there is an implied crossing at every intersection unless posted otherwise? What sort of feature gets tagged crossing=no? Does one draw a line or node to represent the footway that isn't there? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
