On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:09 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
> The way I see it:

> crossing=no – crossing here is not legal/possible

> crossing=unmarked – there are no road markings (or traffic signals) that 
> indicate this is a designated crossing, but based on other factors, it’s a 
> location where pedestrians common cross, e.g. because of lowered kerbs, or 
> because the sidewalk on one side of the road ended

> crossing=uncontrolled – there are road markings indicating this is a 
> designated pedestrian crossing, but no traffic signals that explicitly tell 
> pedestrians when they have to stop

> crossing=traffic_signals – there are explicit traffic signals that tell 
> pedestrians when to stop. There are very likely road markings, but even if 
> not, the absence of road markings, in the presence of actual traffic signals, 
> is irrelevant for how this crossing operates.

Does any of this change in a jurisdiction where there is an implied
crossing at every intersection unless posted otherwise?

What sort of feature gets tagged crossing=no? Does one draw a line or
node to represent the footway that isn't there?

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to