On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 18:04, Nick Bolten <nbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a pretty good example of some of that unhelpful behavior I > mentioned... >
Projection much? There is a toxic habit that's far too common on this mailing list to > speculate about bad intentions and then state them as if they are fact. It > serves no purpose other than to divide and denigrate and has no place in a > community-oriented project. > YOU were the one who claimed, without evidence, that others had accused you of acting in bad faith. YOU MADE THAT CLAIM. I wondered why you had done so because, in another sub-thread, you implied that I was disagreeing with you because I hated people with visual impairments. Here's the quote from that thread: Anyways, that's a strange way to frame "mapping something I don't care about". How is it obsessive? I've already listed several important use cases, so I will be blunt: do you think people with low vision are irrelevant and don't matter? Is this an ableist community? Do pedestrians getting struck by cars not matter? Is it okay that they die? That looks very much to me like you were demonizing those who disagreed with you. Poisoning the well. It sure looks that way. Whether you intended it to or not. It came across as you accusing me of hating the visually impaired, or at least not caring if they live or die. People should ignore anything I say, because I hate the blind. If people have been accusing you of acting in bad faith (I've yet to see evidence of that) then I can understand why if that is how you typically interact with them. But everybody is marching out of step except you, so lets have a moderated forum where you are the moderator. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging