11 May 2019, 19:47 by selfishseaho...@gmail.com: > On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 17:05, Johnparis <> ok...@johnfreed.com > <mailto:ok...@johnfreed.com>> > wrote: > >> >> For bus routes, at least, there is an established convention for the name >> tag. I have mapped hundreds of such routes. It is definitely NOT a "misuse". >> > > It seems quite popular, but it doesn't agree with how the name=* tag > is usually used. > The problem is that typical use of name tag for public transport routes is a misuse of name tag, and that using name tag as description is accepted by a proposal. The question is whatever it requires separate proposal to fix old proposal or is invoking general rule "name tag is for name, description tag is for description" sufficient.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
