Hi, it feels a bit wrong to me to use cycleway=crossing on a highway=footway or highway=path, as described on the wiki page <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dcrossing>. I might have been doing it wrong all the time but I always use hw=footway + footway=crossing hw=cycleway + cycleway=crossing hw=path + path=crossing
Accessibility should imo be tagged using access-tags bicycle=yes/designated/etc, or implied using default hw=*-values. Am 16.04.2019 um 15:47 schrieb marc marc:
Le 16.04.19 à 15:25, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit :Apr 16, 2019, 2:50 PM by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > highway=path/highway=footway that has bicycle=yes/bicycle=designated. highway=path + path=crossing + bicycle=yes|designate or highway=footway + footway=crossing + bicycle=yes|designate is not enought ? It is enough, I rephrased it. Hopefully it is now more redable direct link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dcrossing edit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Acycleway%3Dcrossing&type=revision&diff=1843156&oldid=1843110yes it's more redable, but i still find it strange. I think this tag only makes sense when one of these two ways crosses a road : highway=cycleway or highway=path|footway + cycleway=* if there is no cycleway=* before the crossing, it is normal that the crossing way does not have a cycleway e.g. a highway=path + cycleway=no + bicycle=yes crossing a road must not have a cycleway=crossing. no cycleway exist there. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
