> highway=cycleway cycleway=crossing

I have been mapping more and more cycleways here in Japan, and there is a true 
need for cycleway=crossing. 

Unlike some other countries where the cycleway is more akin to a road, 
cycleways here in Japan are often treated like footpaths, and dead-end into 
sidewalks and use pedestrian crosswalks for crossing roads. I have no problem 
using relation links to incluse non-cycleway ways into a larger cyclepath 
replation, but often times a cyclepath crosses a road and there is heavily 
painted markings, such as a zebra crossing. 

there are ~12,000 uses of cycleway=crossing  on ways according to taginfo, but 
no documentation for the tag. 

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cycleway=crossing 
<https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cycleway=crossing>

I understand that in some places the mental model of using a crossing for 
something that feels like a “road” is absurd, but for paths that are forced to 
use crosswalks and various pedestrian traffic control features, we need to 
document and codify the cycleway=crossing tag. when you use a zebra crossing to 
cross a road, not marking that as a “crossing” of some type feels wrong. 

Javbw


> On Jan 27, 2019, at 2:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> sent from a phone
> 
>> On 26. Jan 2019, at 15:17, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The fact that the road is crossed by is crossed by a cycleway is already 
>> defined by the "highway" tags' values of the two crossing highways.
> 
> 
> +1, I would go with highway=crossing and crossing=type of crossing, on the 
> crossing node and highway=cycleway cycleway=crossing on the crossing part of 
> the cycleway (way)
> 
> Cheers, Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to