On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 16:02, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9. Mar 2019, at 14:03, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But there could be roads adjacent to two sides of a parking > space, only one of which actually connects to it and the router could > guess wrong. > > > are we going to connect all roadside parking to the center of the road > ,thereby misrepresenting the extent significantly, because in some > hypothetical rare case there might be a parking between roads which isn’t > accessible from both roads? > Typically there will be access roads for parkings unless they are not > wider than a parking lot. Here’s an example around here for parking between > 2 roads with access from only one side, no issues encountered so far: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490431306 > > Until you gave that example, I thought you made some fair points. Now I do not think so. I couldn't make sense of what was going on. I couldn't tell how to access those parking spaces or how they connected to the road network. I had to switch to the editor before any of it made sense to me, and then what I saw from reality didn't match up with what the rendering showed me. The result of doing it your way is FAR worse than I thought it would be. You're nit-picking about minor problems that might be faced by autonomous vehicles parking slightly in the road and giving the major problem that many spaces accessible directly from the north carriage of Circonvallazione Ostiense appear to be only indirectly accessible from the south carriage of Circonvallazione Ostiense via a twisted route of parking aisles. Before that example I thought your way of doing it was sub-optimal. Now I see it as being badly wrong. I don't think we'll ever agree on this one. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
