Mar 2, 2019, 2:05 AM by [email protected]: > On 2019-03-02 01:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > >> sent from a phone >> >>> On 1. Mar 2019, at 13:45, Mateusz Konieczny >>> <[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:I would tag max weight, I would >>> not tag emergency=no. >>> >> +1, it will not exclude all kinds of emergency services anyway, only those >> in vehicles that are too heavy, for example there could be police on >> bicycles who could cycle on the bridge like pedestrians can walk on >> it.Cheers, Martin >> > > > > > I really-really-really like to know of a place where emergency vehicles > are > legally > not allowed to go... > > > And if there isn't such a place, why do we need ""? > > > And if we don't have such a need, why do we need "emergency=yes"? > > > Because a given road is > accessible > to a emergency vehicles? > > Apparently people like to explicitly tag in some situations. Though in all cases when I used it I should be using emergency=designated (road was signed as firefighter access road or main ambulance access at the hospital).
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
