Feb 28, 2019, 1:24 PM by fernando.treb...@gmail.com: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:58 PM Mateusz Konieczny > <> matkoni...@tutanota.com <mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com>> > wrote: > >> >> Feb 27, 2019, 7:31 PM by >> ba...@ursamundi.org >> <mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org>>> : >> >> motor_vehicle=no would exclude most emergency vehicles. >> >> No, it would not. motor_vehicle=no is a legal limitation. >> > > Currently, it actually would because emergency=* is nested under > motor_vehicle=* in the access tags hierarchy. [1] So to express that > motor vehicles (cars, trucks, etc.) are forbidden but emergency > vehicles are not, both motor_vehicle=no + emergency=yes are required. > The same would happen if access=no was used instead of > motor_vehicle=no. > Just because something is written on Wiki page it does not mean that it is 100% gluten free revealed truth. Can you give an example of place where emergency vehicles are legally forbidden from entering? > I agree that typically emergency vehicles are allowed essentially > everywhere due to the nature of their emergency work, so maybe the > hierarchy should be changed by moving emergency=* to be a sibling, not > a child of motor_vehicle=*, or perhaps even a sibling of vehicle=* > since emergency work in certain areas might be provided using human or > animal-powered modes of transport. > I will try to amend wiki, though maybe in a different way.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
