On 15.02.19 11:03, Stephan Bösch-Plepelits wrote: > Example: There is this museum, which openened in 2011, but the building is > much older, it was built in 1725: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1937535
The root of the issue is that two different features (a building, and a museum inside that building) are mapped as a single OSM element. That's ok as a shortcut in simple cases, but when the two features have different names, different Wikipedia links, and different start dates, they should really be split into two elements: One for the building, one for the museum. Generally, I believe that following a "One feature <=> one OSM element" principle will lead to cleaner data. Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
