On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 08:29, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote:
> > You may prefer to use landuse=logging or something that has a clear meaning > rather than landuse=forestry to tag areas used primarily to grow wood. > Given the wikipedia page you pointed to earlier in the thread, I agree that landuse=forestry is a bad idea (almost as bad as landuse=forest was). What I was after was a way of distinguishing a large area in which trees are logged, part of which may currently have trees on it and part of which may currently have stumps, or saplings, or scrub. Something with defined borders which do not change from year to year and so will not have to have the outline changed every time newer aerial imagery comes along. I agree that landuse=logging is a far better tag than landuse=forestry. So is it possible for us to agree on landuse=logging here as an alternative to landuse=forest? To agree that dual-tagging is permissible until the day that landuse=logging is rendered in standard carto? To agree that landuse=forest be deprecated once landuse=logging is rendered? To agree that, once landuse=logging is rendered, the wiki should say that landuse=logging + natural=wood can be simplified to just landuse=logging when editing existing features that are dual-tagged? If we can agree to all that here (and, let's recognize that there's nothing stopping anybody using landuse=logging + natural=wood right now) do we need a formal proposal or is a "show of hands" here sufficient to allow it to be added to the wiki? -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
