On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 at 23:52, LeTopographeFou <letopographe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm ok to consider a proposal which would lead to the tourism=accomodation > schema. > > But I think that whatever we do (new schema vs existing schema) an > "Accomodation" wiki page (routing to hotel/motel/... tags) will be helpfull > to today route to existing tags and maybe tomorrow explain the new schema. > I agree with most of what has been said here, especially "the only practical distinction today is the name on the front sign", however > Le 01/01/2019 à 03:23, Silent Spike a écrit : > > the current information there considers motels to be a subclass of hotels > (so all motels are hotels, not all hotels are motels). > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 6:27 AM Allan Mustard <al...@mustard.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Local licensing authorities do not differentiate between them and they >>>>> are regulated identically, >>>>> >>>> As I mentioned previously, in Australia at least, licensing authorities *do* differentiate between them, in that a hotel is licensed to sell alcohol, while a motel isn't. Granted, that doesn't effect accommodation options, but a motel is not, strictly speaking, a hotel. Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
