Yeah... you're right... "/Buildings are classified as having a "soft story" if that level is less than 70% as stiff as the floor immediately above it, or less than 80% as stiff as the average stiffness of the three floors above it./" [1]
hard to eyeball that... But the key would be right for importing such information from some official source. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_story_building On 2018-12-17 03:32, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Is "soft storey" something that is officially declared, or would it only be > based on an individual mappers opinion? > > As it refers to the possibly enhanced danger of a building collapsing during > an earthquake, are we leaving ourselves open to potential complaints from a > building owner that we have listed that building as "dangerous", usually > based solely on an external viewing by a (probably) unqualified person? > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On 2018-12-17 00:42, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > >> So far, building:soft_storey:y/n seems to be the least controversial way >> to tag these buildings. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging