6. Dec 2018 20:49 by mark+...@carnildo.com <mailto:mark+...@carnildo.com>:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:54:44 +0100 > Rory McCann <> r...@technomancy.org <mailto:r...@technomancy.org>> > wrote: > >> On 06/12/2018 08:38, Mark Wagner wrote: >> > Yellowstone National Park has attracted a fair few bare >> >> > * Petrified Tree, a large, petrified section of tree trunk. >> >> natural=tree? natural=petrified_tree ? > > "Tree" is misleading. "natural=petrified_tree" would be good, except > it gets zero hits in TagInfo. > It is perfectly fine to use tag fo the first time. Happens fairly often to me during cleanup of bare tourism=attraction. >> > * Norris Geyser Basin, Upper Geyser Basin, Artist Paint Pots, >> > Fountain Paint Pots, and other named groups of thermal features. >> >> natural=geyser ? > > "natural=geyser" is already in use for geysers. Applying it to entire > geyser basins would be like using the same tag for both single trees > and forests. (It would also be inaccurate, since these basins usually > contain a mix of geysers, fumaroles, hot springs, and occasionally mud > pots.) natural=geyser_basin? >> > * Roaring Mountain, a hillside that contains a large number of steam >> > vents. >> >> place=locality ? natural=peak ? natural=hill ? > > "locality" might work, but it's even more generic than "tourist > attraction". "Peak" or "hill" don't work -- the summit is almost a mile > to the southwest of the actual point of interest. > natural=geothermal_area (????)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
