Despite the remaining problem of just how best to map the Iarge Alaskan bay that started this conversation, it's been very interesting. For now, I'll just let it remain as a node and hope that a better label rendering solution for a water body as large as Cook Inlet comes along during my lifetime. I will decide whether to use multipolygons to show smaller bays and straits on a case by case basis.
Thanks to all for your contributions. Alaska Dave On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 4:51 AM Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 9:30 PM Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> It is sounding as if Frederik and Christoph are willing to tolerate >> limited experiments as long as we mostly don't damage the coastline, >> > > Life would be so much easier if we had a sandbox. > > >> and keep our areas small enough not to break the toolchain. >> > > I was contemplating generalizing Cardigan Bay. Maybe a few dozen nodes. > But now you've made me > worry that it's not just the node count I should be concerned about but > also the size of the area > enclosed. Like I said, if only we had a sandbox... > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
