Following with interest (& I've got to say, that with my admittedly limited knowledge, that I agree with Dave, Kevin & Daniel's interpretation of how to do it).
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 09:48, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > > That is also why the coastline is never fully verifiable, but I would be > against solving it by using a node instead of a conventional straight > line - visible for example on La Plata estuary up to z7: > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=-36.29153&lon=-56.77843#map=7/-35.782/-55.684 With regard to the River Plate, when you look at how it's been mapped as a multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3474227, why is the name shown where it is? I would have thought that with everything being "equal", the name would have been pretty well on a straight line between La Plata & Montevideo, & on a N - S line between the final A in Nueva Helveci *a* & the left hand angle in the international maritime border? & I'll also add that if I'd done the amount of work that Daniel or Rober had, then someone came along, said "I don't agree with the way you've done that", & deleted it all, then I'd be extremely cheesed off! :-( Thanks Graeme > > > > -- > "Excuse me, I have some growing up to do" [P. Gabriel] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
