W dniu 16.11.2018 o 12:24, Christoph Hormann pisze: > Yes, as already said i understand that and this is why i do not > primarily blame you or other mappers for using non-verifiable drawings > to map bays and straits but Daniel for incentivizing that for > ultimately selfish reasons.
Using strong words, blaming, judging etc. is not helping to solve anything, it's rather making it harder. But I understand that's your opinion. Rendering perfectly documented and used features sounds like a good thing for the entire project, no matter how do you call my reasons and who do you choose to blame. > Correct position would be aroundhere: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=57.9877&mlon=-154.0407#map=9/57.9877/-154.0407 It would be much more useful if you tell now how to verify position of this node? And why do you tell "around" if this is sure method, not just your random choice? I remember that your claim is verification is that other user would do the same. It certainly does not work this way in this case - some other user put it in a different place already. So there are at least 2 different positions - hard to say that it confirms or proves anything. I am fully aware that drawing area is not fully verifiable. But you claim that drawing a node is better in that particular respect. How can you prove it? -- "Excuse me, I have some growing up to do" [P. Gabriel] _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
