Host might be a nicer word, but in diplo-speak it is possible to have a different host from the entity to which the mission is accredited (think of the various missions to the World Trade Organization in Geneva: target=WTO, host=CH.
On 11/11/2018 11:49 AM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 at 12:34, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com > <mailto:sea...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Just a suggestion. Under the "Additional tags routinely used would > include" section, name=* and country=* are listed. I think the > target=* tag (for the receiving country) should also be included > since it is already documented in the amenity=embassy page. (I am > not sure if "target" is a good term for this tag but it is already > in use so it might be okay to just adopt it as is.) > > > Would "host" be a nicer word? > > But wouldn't it be covered by the name eg "Australian Embassy to Russia"? > > Thanks > > Graeme > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
