Also agreed. I'm not saying anything about the route tag. We're talking about tags other than route or type, which actually set up the relation. The additional tags that describe the route or multipolygon either go on the relation or the ways depending on their scope, but not both.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 5:31 PM Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> wrote: > And route=foot does not mean al the components are footpaths. > > Op do 8 nov. 2018 om 11:05 schreef Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com>: > >> On 08/11/2018 01:59, Dave Swarthout wrote: >> > To my way of thinking, a tag in the relation implicitly applies to >> > every member of the relation. >> >> No. Think of a long-distance footpath - that may have an operator, or >> it may have tags that apply specifically to the footpath route. It may >> also run along a road for a short distance - it doesn't mean that the >> footpath "operator" is the "operator" of the road. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Andy >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > -- > Vr gr Peter Elderson > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
