I would not tag that as a crossing for pedestrians at all. Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 27 okt. 2018 om 00:14 heeft Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:01, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org> wrote: >> On 26.10.2018 16:41, Robert Skedgell wrote: >> > On 26/10/18 11:44, Tom Pfeifer wrote: >> >> Tagging "unmarked crossings" does not make sense for me. An unmarked >> >> crossing is defined in OSM by a road and a footway sharing a node, there >> >> is no need for a tag here, as there is nothing special. >> > >> > An unmarked crossing may have no road markings or signs, but if there is >> > tactile paving and/or a raised/lowered/flush kerb on the footway >> > (sidewalk), how else would one tag it? > > So how would you tag this situation: > https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.0707782,153.4362109,3a,75y,140.17h,73.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0bHjLjjqqe1rrdNWfLu94g!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D0bHjLjjqqe1rrdNWfLu94g%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D296.4197%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656 > > There is a footpath along the side of the road, which drops to road level via > a lowered kerb, to meet up with another lowered kerb on the other side of the > road. There are no signs or markings of any sort. > > I map them as crossing=unmarked > > Any other suggestions? > > Thanks > > Graeme > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
