Sure but if anyone has something to say that is directly related to my proposal
it would be best to discuss it there.
Other than that, is it complete enough to move it from Draft to Proposed?
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, October 12, 2018 3:21 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Took me a while to find it .. to save otehrs time here is a link.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/toy_and_game_library
>
> Proposals are usually discussed both here and on their own discussion page.
>
> On 11/10/18 20:27, ChameleonScales wrote:
>
>> I made some updates to the wiki proposal and I propose we continue the
>> discussion on its discussion page.
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 11:23 PM, ChameleonScales
>> <chameleonsca...@protonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Game and toy libraries don't fit in any feature type.
>>> They can be but are not necessarily:
>>> - non-profit organizations
>>> - child care facilities
>>> - social faciilties
>>> - toy stores
>>> - libraries
>>> - probably other things
>>>
>>> So I think they should have their own feature type and tag.
>>> How about
>>> amenity:library=game_and_toy
>>>
>>> Would that be possible?
>>>
>>> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
