Ok, I updated the existing proposal (the link is the same, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/assembly_point:purpose ) moving from assembly_point:purpose=<EMERGENCY_TYPE> to assembly_point:<EMERGENCY_TYPE>=* .
Cheers, Daniele Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 06:05:59 +0900 > From: John Willis <jo...@mac.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose > Message-ID: <39497331-d154-430f-85df-f4713c678...@mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > > On Sep 22, 2018, at 11:03 PM, Daniele Santini <danysa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > edit the proposal substituting the old tag and values with the new tags > or create a new proposal with the new tags? > > If you feel the original proposal (or the discussion around it) is > valuable, start a new one. If it is of minor or no importance, just rewrite > the existing page. You can note "originally started as > assembly_point:purpose=tsunami, etc., " > > Under "rationale", you can use it as an example where assigning a single > value is not flexible enough to accurately tag the multi-use nature of most > assembly_points. > > This will also document the originally proposed tag's role in refining the > currently proposed one, and show up in OSM searches without leading to a > dead proposal page. > > Javbw
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
