> Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 06:42:30 +0900 > From: John Willis <jo...@mac.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - assembly_point:purpose > Message-ID: <688ef169-5441-4a7b-819f-3764eac4c...@mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > > On Sep 22, 2018, at 5:17 AM, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Problem: most assembly points are multi-purpose around here. At least > fire and earthquake. And they are not marked with a purpose. > > > Very true - I think most people assume an assembly point is "safe", as the > location is chosen because it is low-risk for many types of disasters. > > Perhaps we need to have a few assembly_point:foobar=yes, in case people > want to map a specific aspect of one - especially if it is *not* good for > one aspect. > > Tsunami (height in M) > Earthquake > Fire > Landslide > Flood (out of the path of a possible dam breach, levee break, or flash > floods. > Tornado (assumed no, yes has to be explicit) > > With certian assembly points, the idea it is "safe" from a tsunami is very > important. Tornadoes will be basements/bunkers/buried shelters, possibly > fallout shelters. > > But this would be a very small minority of assembly_points. Most will have > no :foobar=tags. > > Perhaps if we can say :tsunami=25 means it is 25m above sea level (the > safe top of the structure) or tsunami=yes/no to say at least go/don't go > here. Same with tornado. > > Many of the assembly points in Japan are chosen specifically because they > will not be flooded if a nearby dam bursts, to be away from known landslide > risks, and to have no tall buildings nearby to fall in an earthquake. > > :Purpose=foobar locks you into a certian purpose, Whereas :tsunami=yes > just means it is "safe" from a tsunami - *if you care to map that*. > > Besides tornado, all are implied yes, so an the assembly point inherits > all the implied traits. > > Javbw. > This makes sense. Should I edit the existng proposal adding this alternative, edit the proposal substituting the old tag and values with the new tags or create a new proposal with the new tags?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
