Thx. Two follow-up questions. (A)
I had a look at a place to which - if I'm not mistaken - you contributed to [1] and I see what you mean. Still, I'm curious why we wouldn't use the "role" attributes of a relation to *explicitly* qualify the outer polygon as the "parent" of the parking spaces (and the other possible parking-related objects, if any). As a was searching more, I saw in JOSM that when I click Presets > Relations > Site, it opens a dialog box which I think tries to explain that one can add nodes, ways or areas with role label, perimeter, entrance or just member (no role). And indeed, when I start writing in the Role column in the relation editor dialog in JOSM, it will autocomplete when I start typing perimeter, label or entrance. But I can't find discussion of that in the wiki. [2] Although when searching even further the wiki, I found an explanation of role "perimeter" and "label". [3] [4] So, it looks like one should tag the amenity=parking member in the relation with role perimeter. What do you think ? (B) By the way, back to [1], I see tags from amenity=parking have been duplicated to the relation object. I would have deleted the tags on amenity=parking to avoid double maintenance work. Is that intended ? [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8448251 [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking#Site_relation [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Site_Perimeter [4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Label _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
