I would make the distinction bub from a map-data end-user's point of view: can I walk/drive up to the place and obtain a permit on the fly, with or without paying a "fee". The on-the-fly payment may include payment of membership of some kind on first entry, or similar arrangements. If access requires prior membership in a club or an association, I would suggest to use access=members. Admittedly there is a soft border with "customers", for example in case of access to the car park of shops that requires membership (e.g. REI in the US).
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, 00:46 marc marc, <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Le 29. 07. 18 à 22:35, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > >> On 27. Jul 2018, at 17:53, marc marc wrote: > >> I didn't understand how getting a license in your example is different > >> from getting a license from a sports club. > > > I would understand that the permit will be obtained by everybody > following the application rules, while the sports club doesn’t give you a > “license”, it requires you to be a member, where it is usually at the > discretion of the other members if they take you or not. > > maybe for a golf sport club. > but for all other sport club I have or I had be a member, > no other members have to (dis)agree or not. > I only need to fill a form, follow the rule and sometime pay a fee > > So I now understand that what somebody call a permit is > a license for somebody else :) > > > I would certainly not call the visitors “customers of the castle”. > > Similarly, the members of a sports club are not “customers” > > so who are the customers of a POI ? > how to map a "for customers only" ? > I often see this tagged as "access=customers" > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
