28. Lipiec 2018 00:20 od graemefi...@gmail.com <mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com>:
> On 28 July 2018 at 03:33, Mike H <> 1jg...@gmail.com > <mailto:1jg...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > >> service=driveway isn't just for residential driveways. It is also used for >> other driveways. Here is an example of a driveway to a church. >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100946154 >> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100946154>>> I would agree that >> residential driveways should probably be implied as access=private. > > But people are allowed to use your driveway in some circumstances eg > tradesmen, couriers, family or friends coming to your house. I think that > access=destination would still allow them to visit, but stop routers from > sending other people up your garden path? :-) access=destination excludes only transit traffic. For private driveways access=private is better, as owner may grant access to whoever (s)he wishes and access is not assumed OK without permission from owner. Note that there are also cases of driveways accessible to public, I would not tag them asaccess=private (typical in for example rural areas).
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
