It has become rarer because of PTv2. There is no distinction in PTv1. On Mon, Jun 25, 2018, 01:24 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2018-06-24 1:20 GMT+02:00 marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> Le 22. 06. 18 à 15:37, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : >> > is there a benefit from it? >> >> try to map a multimodal station bus+train+tram >> with one building + one platform with PTv1 >> the extend for the station is not the same for a bus and a train >> for some ppl, the plafform must not be mapped with the same objet >> for the rail (a way) and for a bus (a node only) >> so for one "passenger waiting area", sometime osm have 2 objets >> > > > yes, a bus stop and a railway platform. For me it looks ok to have 2 > object in this case. > The so-called "multimodel station" (one object) really is just different > ways of transport at some kind of interchange (several objects from this > point of view). > > I was not questioning PTv2 completely, for example I am not against stop > area / stop area group relations, but there is no need to change the > tagging of 2 million bus stops nor have I ever missed a possibility to map > a bus stop and a train platform on the same object. > > > >> try to make a blind routing to a bus stop with PTv1 >> in some country, routing to the highway=bus_stop is fine, >> because it's where ppl wait before jumping into the vehicule >> in some country, it's wrong, the highway=bus_stop in the stop_position >> part of the highway=* for the vehicule, not for the passenger. > > > > yes, bus stops on the highway are an issue, but while this was wide spread > years ago, it seems to have become relatively rare now. > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
