Would this qualify? https://www.google.nl/maps/place/Veluwe/@52.2191306,5.8688533,1379m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c7c9d88ad308b5:0x3d1880bfd62acc1f!8m2!3d52.2387683!4d5.8322737
2018-06-13 12:59 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > 13. Jun 2018 11:58 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > 2018-06-13 11:49 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > >> >> Can you give an example photo of something that would be correctly tagged >> >> landuse=residential and is in "true" forest? >> > > https://www.klett.de/sixcms/media.php/klett72.a.427.de/ > upload/orang_asli_dorf.jpg > > > I see landuse=residential (or =farmyard) within landuse=forest with no > overlap. > > > > https://alleideen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/kleineres-Haus-vorteile- > exterior-wald-470x390.jpg > > > To cropped to say anything. > > > https://d2gg9evh47fn9z.cloudfront.net/800px_COLOURBOX2241126.jpg > > > Looks like landuse=residential within landuse=forest with no overlap, > > but it is strongly cropped. > > > > https://www.klonblog.com/architektur-ein-schickes-und- > gemuetliches-haus-im-wald/ > > > I see no images, also after disabling ad blocker. > > > > https://www.ecowoman.de/images/stories/Natur_und_Umwelt/Le%20vents%20de% > 20forets%201%20678.jpg > > > I see no landuse=residential here (though there is building=residential). > > > > https://pictures.immobilienscout24.de/listings/1ddb81ae-d508-4159-ba88- > 7d0dda53e696-1130797434.jpg/ORIG/resize/1024x768%3E/format/jpg/quality/80 > > > This may qualify, though it is debatable. > > > Overall, I think that this situation is really rare. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
