landuse=village_green is used a lot. That works fine for grass-covered areas, because it's rendered green, but it misinterprets the term village_green and we're still stuck with the scrub, forest, orchard and hedge type greenery areas. The wiki for village_green says:
*This tag is very often not used to map the distinctive part of a village centre as described above, but to map all kinds of mixed vegetation (plants, bushes, flowers, small trees, grass), mostly in urban areas, very often maintained by the Municipality. See the photos on the talk page for this type of use.* *Such use of the tag is incorrect, and a better tagging for these situations needs to be defined.* I guess I am looking for a better definition which can be implemented without much hustle. E.g. replace landuse=village_green with landuse=decorative (defaut rendering=greenish) then add landcover=scrub|trees|bushes|sand|gravel as needed. If rendering of these landcover values could be foreseen in the near future, retagging can be expected and a lot of fake orchards, mini-forests and fak village_greens would disappear from Nederland. 2018-06-05 6:48 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > > > > 4 Jun 2018, 23:50 by pelder...@gmail.com: > > > Problem is, landcover is not rendered. Nobody is going to retag for > notrendered. Probably never going to change. > > Using landcover (probably in addition to rendered tags) increases chance > that > it will be rendered by at least some. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
