In that case it is a service-thing rather than a route-thing. Is it generally used like that? The wiki just mentions the co-location of start/endpoint of the route.
The suggested use as a validator-tag requires the use exactlly as the wiki says, while other suggested uses mark cases where the tag differs from the location-based definition. I see a consistency problem here... which explains why the actual use of this tag is also inconsistent. 2018-05-25 11:58 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> The only use case I can imagine is when a roundtrip has one ore more >> access ways which are included in the route relation. But even then, what >> is the purpose? >> > > I would say that roundtrip=yes on route A->B->A means that you can remain > on the bus at B and roundtrip=no means > that you are (officially) required to disembark. I mention "officially" > because some drivers may permit some passengers > to remain on the bus. If you are required to disembark at B, even if you > do not have to buy another ticket when you > get back on board, it's roundtrip=no. It's not a matter of duration of > the stop at B, it's whether or not you can start at > A and return to A without leaving the bus. > > -- > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
