You have other tags to mark there is more than one direction:
oneway=no

I think it is important to  keep the sense of the wiki, why?
Because , with data you can "imagine" (or render) some kind of reality. It
is not the same:

1
oneway=no
lanes=1
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/jYQQwOGMPC6imwyGhMHMCg

2
oneway=no
lanes=2
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xg8szNBm0vd2ESAkjds1DA

3
oneway=yes
lanes=1
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/OxpRJfW_9qy_Z8QL4NoWXw

4
oneway=yes
lanes=2
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/oENxpXhruhvcFszNlkudtg

Think about it : with more than one lane you can overtake legally. With
only one lane you cannot overtake in your same direction because you don't
have any lane to pass by. If the streetof only one lane is wide enough you
can pass a stopped car, but you cannot overtake it if they are moving also.
Ask it to the police. I think is interesting to keep the meaning of the
tagging scheme.

May we have to retag all the oneway=no without lanes all over the world?
May we have to add a new tag called divider (or similar?) . For me if
divider=yes lanes > 1 , if divider=no lanes = 1 so I don't need a new tag
to remark it.

Salut i marques vials (Health and road marks)
yopaseopor

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 7:45 PM, <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:

> Personally, I tend to tag roads that are wide enough for 2 lanes (two cars
> can pass each other without noticeably slowing down) and which are clearly
> meant to be two lane (one lane each direction) roads with:
>
> lanes=2
> divider=no
>
> Yes, I know that is in violation of the strict reading of the wiki, but I
> feel it makes sense, and as far as I can determine, tagging roads that are
> meant to have two lanes with lanes=2 even in the absence of such road
> markings seems to be pretty widespread practice. (The use of the divider
> tag isn't very widespread, but again, I feel it makes sense in this
> context.)
>
> Cheers,
> Thorsten
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, 23 May 2018 01:18
> > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> > <tagging@openstreetmap.org>
> > Subject: [Tagging] Sample tagging for highways with no lane
> > markings
> >
> > In reviewing the wiki in preparation to fixing some of my older
> > mapping, it seems there is an inconsistency in how to tag a road
> > that is wide enough to two lanes of traffic but is lacking lane
> > striping.
> >
> > In the lanes description [1] it says "the lanes=* key should be
> > used to specify the total number of marked lanes of a road." But in
> > the out of town highway tagging sample page [2] with a photo
> > described as "smaller road, maybe tertiary with appropriate
> > administrative status" it shows a lane count on a road with no
> > markings.
> >
> > Am I correct in believing that the example photo should have its
> > tagging changed, dropping the lanes=2 and adding a width tag (if
> > the width is known or can be reasonably estimated)?
> >
> > My current interest is in fixing the tagging for residential roads
> > that are wide enough for bi-directional traffic with legal parallel
> > parking but have no markings on the pavement. I don't see a exact
> > match to that in either the urban [3] or rural highway [2] tagging
> > example pages.
> >
> > To use the street I live on as an example, am I correct that a
> > residential road with bidirectional traffic and parallel parking
> > with no markings should be tagged as:
> >
> > highway=residential
> > surface=asphalt
> > parking:lane:both=parallel
> > width=40’0"
> > maxspeed=25 mph
> >
> > If, and only if, a center strip is added then lanes=2 should be
> > added. (I actually measured the width in this case but for hope to
> > be able to use the measurement tool on aerial imagery in JOSM for
> > most cases).
> >
> > Is my current understanding correct? If so, I will update the wiki
> > pages for both the urban and rural highway tagging examples to
> > reflect that and will take some photos of the roads in my area to
> > make additional examples.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Description
> > [2]
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_tagging_samples/out_of_
> > town
> > [3]
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_tagging_samples/urban
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to