Hi Richard,

This has already been discussed here.
Have a look to those threads please :

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-December/034291.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-January/034932.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-February/035119.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-March/035306.html

You can read the Talk as well
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Hydropower_water_supplies

Consecutively of all those discussions, ideas get more precise and some
points have been changed in the proposal between December and now.
The big benefit is to make the distinction between containers (riverbeds,
pipes, tunnels, canal...) and content (water).
As things are never perfect, we may have further occasions to improve
tagging and wiki a little more.


All the best

François

2018-03-14 23:47 GMT+01:00 Richard <ricoz....@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/
> Hydropower_water_supplies
>
> I think that the proposed invention of waterway=pressurized and its use
> for water in pipelines as well as natural caves should get some
> discussion in the mailing list.
>
> What do people think?
>
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to