It seems like other people have faced this problem before [1]. The link provided by JOSM developers refers to the text in the proposal, not to the main article [3] nor the more specific route type articles.
[1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/13768 [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Fernando Trebien <fernando.treb...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Tijmen Stam <mailingli...@iivq.net> > wrote: > > In PTv2 only a few roles are acceptable: stop and platform (and the > > equivalents stop_exit_only and stop_entry_only) for stops and platforms, > > and _no role_ for the ways in the route. > > In that case, the article on route relations [1] should be updated to > state that forward and backward roles are not always acceptable, and > that the user should read the article on the more specific route type > to know whether it is acceptable or not. > > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Members > > -- > Fernando Trebien > +55 (51) 9962-5409 > > "Nullius in verba." > -- Fernando Trebien +55 (51) 9962-5409 "Nullius in verba."
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
