The article on route relations [1] doesn't make any distinction between PT versions regarding those member roles. If the answer would be different in each case, then I'd like to make the difference explicit in the wiki, at least while PTv1 is still acceptable (probably for a long time).
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are we talking about the PTv1 or the PTv2 schema here? > > On 09/01/18 08:50, Fernando Trebien wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> A user recently questioned me about adding members with role "forward" >> to subway routes in my area. It is my understanding that, if the route >> runs in a single direction, this is allowed and desirable [1]. >> However, specific articles [2][3] on different types of railways seem >> to suggest that the role should be always empty, and I believe this is >> misleading. Does anybody oppose adding these roles to these articles >> as well? >> >> Other such articles currently do not mention relation member roles >> [4], maybe they should. >> >> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Members >> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dsubway#Members >> [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dtram#Members >> [4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dtrain >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- Fernando Trebien +55 (51) 9962-5409 "Nullius in verba." _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
