Hi, Same as Marc too. This proposal was discussed for months prior to start voting.
Fortunatly, tags don't need to be "approved" to be used. If tagging sounds good to people, they will use it, although updating tools ease a lot the adoption process (only with so called approved tagging). A longer time will be required to make it better. François *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux> 2017-10-05 15:58 GMT+02:00 Mark Bradley <ethnicfoodisgr...@gmail.com>: > > Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:14:56 +0000 > > From: marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> > > To: "tagging@openstreetmap.org" <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Fire Hydrant > > Extensions) > > > > Hello, > > > > Le 05. 10. 17 à 12:16, Viking a écrit : > > > I really don't understand why so many people oppose this proposal [1] > > > without ever having participated in the discussions > > it is indeed strange that no opponent took the time to say during the > RFC arguments > > that are found now during the vote. > > > > yes the wiki page need a cleaning between the basic tags and the > advanced tags. is it > > the role of a tag vote to talk about the layout of the wiki page or > should we talk > > about tag changes ? > > imho wiki layout doesn't need a vote, it only need to follow tag meaning > > > > yes the proposal will change many objects but changing 1k objects or > 100k it is the > > same work when updating an app. > > > > yes it will need a transition period for the few specialized apps to be > updated but it is > > not by splitting the proposal tag by tag that it will be better, on the > contrary devs will > > have to do x release instead of being able to group them. > > > > There are also hardly understandable arguments as opposed to the > replacement of > > fire_hydrant:position by location since they have the same meaning. > > > > ihmo removing the namespace when it is useless and the proposed > additional (and > > optional) tags are a heavy but coherent and positive set > > > > Regardless of the outcome of the ongoing vote, I would like to take this > opportunity > > to thank you for the time you have devoted to it and for the > constructive spirit in the > > search for a concessus. > > > > I hope that this energy will persist if the current proposal fails due > to "voting-only" > > people. > > > > Regards, > > Marc > > > I echo Marc's sentiment! > > Mark > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
